Story · arXiv

The Working Set of a Coding Agent: Coherence Debt in Repository-Scale Tasks (arXiv)

paper · Story page

A network diagram of connected nodes. Most nodes are solid; three are dashed outlines with dashed edges. A stack of pages on the left and a brain outline on the right each send an arrow into a solid node.

The paper models repository-scale coding as rebuilding a graph of coupled facts; facts covered by neither context nor parametric memory are coherence debt. Across seven models and five harnesses, availability decides the outcome, not distance from the edit, and passing harnesses differ more than tenfold in tokens.

In plain words

  • A study found that coding systems fail when required project facts are unavailable, even when those facts concern nearby changes.
  • Large software projects contain connected requirements involving tests, file references, settings, and rules for updating stored information.
  • Before editing, a coding system must retrieve each relevant requirement from recent text or its learned knowledge.
  • Supplying a missing fact restored success, while processing more text could not replace information that was never provided.
  • Builders of coding tools should keep required facts available instead of assuming more text processing will solve the problem.

Appeared in

Subscribe

Get the brief in your inbox

Pick daily, weekly, or both. Nothing is gated either way: every issue is on the site and in the feeds.

  • Weekdays at 8:45am IST, one lead story and 6 to 9 items.
  • Sundays, an argued synthesis rather than a recap.
  • One click to leave, and quiet days say so in the subject line.
How often

Weekdays 8:45am IST + Sundays. Unsubscribe in one click.

You're asking for The Agentic Brief by email at the cadence you picked. You can unsubscribe in one click from any issue, and your address is never sold or shared.