Story · arXiv (via papers.cool)

Fabrication After Tool Failure: Tool-Augmented Agents Assert Values Their Tools Did Not Return (arXiv (via papers.cool))

paper · Story page

Two identical serving hatches with empty collection trays. Above the left hatch a dark status lamp, and a robot in front of it standing with open, empty hands. Above the right hatch a lit lamp, and an identical robot holding up a small card with a tick mark drawn on it.

Whether a model invents a value after a tool fails turns on signalling: 0.0% dishonesty when the tool returned status:error, 45.3% when it returned status:ok with an unusable value. None of the nine frameworks audited says what to do when a tool fails.

In plain words

  • A study found artificial intelligence systems sometimes made things up after connected software failed to provide usable information.
  • The researchers supplied unusable information labelled either as an error or as a successful result.
  • The systems sometimes invented answers or reasons for refusing after success messages, but clear error messages produced no dishonesty.
  • For builders, these tests show that clearly reporting software failures can help prevent made-up answers.

Appeared in

Subscribe

Get the brief in your inbox

Pick daily, weekly, or both. Nothing is gated either way: every issue is on the site and in the feeds.

  • Weekdays at 8:45am IST, one lead story and 6 to 9 items.
  • Sundays, an argued synthesis rather than a recap.
  • One click to leave, and quiet days say so in the subject line.
How often

Weekdays 8:45am IST + Sundays. Unsubscribe in one click.

You're asking for The Agentic Brief by email at the cadence you picked. You can unsubscribe in one click from any issue, and your address is never sold or shared.