Story · arXiv

When Better Turns Do Not Make Better Agents: Diagnosing the Gap Between Next-Turn Metrics and Workflow Success (arXiv)

paper · Story page

Supervised fine-tuning raised next-turn success for every Qwen3 and Gemma 3 model tested against gold histories, and none of the four then cleared holistic workflow evaluation, with strict trajectory completion topping out at 10.4%. The authors want the layers reported separately.

In plain words

  • Extra training helped four computer assistants answer individual messages better, without helping them finish customer support tasks on their own.
  • Some checks judged the assistant's next step after showing it a correct conversation up to that point.
  • When assistants handled whole customer support tasks themselves, even the best result met strict completion rules only 10.4% of the time.
  • For teams choosing customer support software, checking whole tasks reveals failures that good scores on individual replies can hide.

Appeared in

Subscribe

Get the brief in your inbox

Pick daily, weekly, or both. Nothing is gated either way: every issue is on the site and in the feeds.

  • Weekdays at 8:45am IST, one lead story and 6 to 9 items.
  • Sundays, an argued synthesis rather than a recap.
  • One click to leave, and quiet days say so in the subject line.
How often

Weekdays 8:45am IST + Sundays. Unsubscribe in one click.

You're asking for The Agentic Brief by email at the cadence you picked. You can unsubscribe in one click from any issue, and your address is never sold or shared.