Story · Jo Kristian Bergum (Hornet.dev)

The unreasonable effectiveness of BM25 for agentic search (Jo Kristian Bergum (Hornet.dev))

talk · Story page

The lexical function didn't change, Bergum argues, the user did: a model knows entities, dates and product identifiers, so it writes far longer queries than a person would and fires a dozen in a row. He points at a benchmark where accuracy is high with answer-bearing documents in context and drops once the model has to fetch them.

In plain words

  • Bergum argues that an old method of matching search words to documents works well for artificial intelligence.
  • The software can search repeatedly using more names, dates, and product details than a person would usually type.
  • In a test, it answered more accurately when given documents containing the answers than when it had to find them.
  • For people building automated research tools, finding the right documents can be an obstacle to accurate answers.

Appeared in

Subscribe

Get the brief in your inbox

Pick daily, weekly, or both. Nothing is gated either way: every issue is on the site and in the feeds.

  • Weekdays at 8:45am IST, one lead story and 6 to 9 items.
  • Sundays, an argued synthesis rather than a recap.
  • One click to leave, and quiet days say so in the subject line.
How often

Weekdays 8:45am IST + Sundays. Unsubscribe in one click.

You're asking for The Agentic Brief by email at the cadence you picked. You can unsubscribe in one click from any issue, and your address is never sold or shared.